FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

2 x 6 Walls – Header Construction

ChrisV | Posted in Construction Techniques on May 19, 2006 09:41am

Hi All,

Mostly framed with 2 x 4 walls and headers were simple (2 -2x + 1/2″ ply…done)but I have started doing 2 x 6 walls. My methods for making headers for the 5-1/2″ wall thickness seem to be to time consuming. Looking for ideas that’s are quick and cost efficient and will still make the inspectors happy.

Thanks,

Chris

Reply
  • X
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • pinterest
  • email
  • add to favorites Log in or Sign up to save your favorite articles

Replies

  1. angusj | May 19, 2006 10:00am | #1

    double 2x nailed together and pushed to the outside,  then insulate the space left on the inside.  (double if the span permits)  Works well here in BC.

    1. TLE | May 19, 2006 04:50pm | #2

      Ditto.

      Terry

    2. JohnT8 | May 19, 2006 06:46pm | #3

      double 2x nailed together and pushed to the outside,  then insulate the space left on the inside.

      And then use extra long screws when putting the drywall up?

       jt8

      "The difference between greatness and mediocrity is often how an individual views a mistake..."-- Nelson Boswell

      1. User avater
        Soultrain | May 19, 2006 07:29pm | #4

        double 2x nailed together and pushed to the outside,  then insulate the space left on the inside.

        And then use extra long screws when putting the drywall up?

        Put another 2x6 laying flat underneath the header so you have the 2x header resting on the 2x6 which is in turn bearing on the jack studs.  This way you can screw the drywall to the top plate & to the flat 2x6.

        1. ChrisV | May 19, 2006 09:09pm | #5

          I was wondering about the sheetrock myself...What about if you have cripples, wouldn't you want a 2 x 6 (on top of the header) on flat for them or else the inside of the cripple bottom would be floating?

          Chris

           

        2. DonNH | May 19, 2006 10:47pm | #8

          How about a sandwich of 2x with insulation in the middle?  Gives nailing surfaces both faces. That's what I was planning to do on my garage: 2-2x6's w/ 2" foam in between (full dimension lumber)

          Don

          1. wane | May 19, 2006 11:00pm | #9

            I make the jack and cripple studs from one piece cut a notch 1 1/2 X 5 1/2 out of the front and back at header hieght and block between them, alternatively the cripples between the headers can be cut and extra 5 1/2 long, 2 wide and double as blocks ..

          2. ChrisV | May 20, 2006 01:41am | #10

            For now I  just had door/window headers in mind (3' -4').

             I was considering making box beams 2- 2x pushed to the outside and inside and then a 2x6 on flat on the top edges of the 2-2x and a 2x6 on flat on the bottom edges. I didn't take this route because I thought the inspector would complain that the 2-1/2" gap between the 2 2x yields no strength with the face nailing of the header...?

          3. angusj | May 20, 2006 08:00am | #12

            Where are you building?  I know here there are some really spesific guides for sizing headers in the code book in bc.  Based on loads ie # of floors and roof, spans etc.  they also only allow for one strip of plywood to be in between so that the two peices can be properly fastened together.  I can't remember the details on that as we never do it this way.  As for the drywall nailing a 2x6 under the header leaves a span for the dry wall that is certainly smaller than the stud spacing that it is being spaned elsewhere in the same wall.  the riping nailed on to the bottom works well if room under the header is an issue.(2.5"x 1.5")

          4. ChrisV | May 20, 2006 04:21pm | #13

            n AZ, one story residential buildings.

            On the headers you build, the 2.5" ripped piece is at the bottom and top? If so then you are not nailing in the area below and above the ripped strips?

             

          5. User avater
            zachariah | May 20, 2006 04:57pm | #14

            just read your post, seems like a very complicated time consuming and hence expensive way to go when you could use 3 2xs and 2 rips of ply in 1/10th the time and effort and twice the strength.

             

          6. User avater
            Soultrain | May 20, 2006 09:30pm | #15

            I don't understand what all the ripping of 2x material is for.  What's wrong with 2 2x10s (or whatever the span requires) pushed to the outside with a 2x6 on the flat nailed securely to the bottom of the header?

          7. Framer | May 21, 2006 02:58am | #16

            "I don't understand what all the ripping of 2x material is for. What's wrong with 2 2x10s (or whatever the span requires) pushed to the outside with a 2x6 on the flat nailed securely to the bottom of the header?"He was talking about ripping plywood. I do the same as you with 2-2x10's with a 2x6 cap on the bottom.Some houses I've used 5-1/2" x 9-1/2" or 11-7/8" lvl's when specked. Even with 2x4 walls I use 2-2x10's with a 2x4 cap on the bottom and never used plywood before.Joe Carola

            Edited 5/20/2006 7:59 pm ET by Framer

          8. Mark | May 21, 2006 03:49am | #17

            I built hundreds and hundreds of headers like that when I was framing.  2x6 bottom "header plate" 2x10 pushed flush with the "inside and another flush with the "outside"  fiberglass insulation in the middle and there ya are.  solid nailing on both sides of the wall for drywall, siding, oversized casing  whatever. 

            what you basically have is a "u" shaped header that you then nail to the king studs and top plate.

            Back when everything we did was standard 8' walls, this gave you a perfect header height for most standard doors and windows without screwing around with cripples 'n stuff.   Of course nowadays all these 9', 10', and taller walls has made that moot.

             

            One tip.  it's easier to lay the insulation in between the 2x10s before you nail the second one in place, rather than trying to stuff it into that 2" opening after the fact." If I were a carpenter"

          9. User avater
            zachariah | May 21, 2006 04:11am | #18

            why insulate a dead space ? is solid wood not a good enough insulator?

            also, it seems to me that when you separate the 2x10s you are allowing the exterior side 2x10 to carry the majority of load with no added strength (in roof load bearing walls)

            Edited 5/20/2006 9:19 pm ET by zachariah

          10. Mark | May 25, 2006 02:55am | #23

            first;   No. Dead air is not a good insulator.  If that were true we wouldn't be insulating any of our stud spaces.  neither is solid wood a good insulator.  the studs and headers are actually the weakest link in the r-value of the houses that are being built.  (well, except maybe for the doors and windows... oh and that pesky fireplace,  and let's not forget.... hold on!! I'm drifting off the subject....)

               this is one reason why I prefer a box beam over a solid one,  because it gives you a little bit more r-value  (albeit not much).  

            Second,   I really don't underastand how only the outside 2x10 might be carrying any more weight than the inside one...????????   they both are subject to the same downward forces exerted by the joists, rafters, or trusses  above them.  It's not like there is only weight on the outside edge of the wall." If I were a carpenter"

          11. User avater
            zachariah | May 26, 2006 02:54pm | #26

            After reading all posts I agree that a box beam is better for R-value but I still would not span one more than 4 ft. . You can not make a logical arguement that a box beam is as strong as a solid packed beam.R-value be damned when your talking about structural integrity.About your question on the different loads on each side of the wall , think sheetrock hanging on one side , boxing, shingles,gutters on the other. 

          12. DoRight | May 27, 2006 03:02am | #32

            Is a box beam stronger than justs doubled up 2 bys?  I don't think so.  I beleive both are teh same or pretty darn close.  The 2 six on the box adds a bit of additional strenght but only that afforded by the nature of one 1 1/2 inche thick board.  (Next to zero).

          13. User avater
            zachariah | May 27, 2006 03:37am | #33

            don't really understand your post, but I am talking about 2x6-1/2"ply-2x6-1/2"ply-2x6, not just double 2x6.

          14. DoRight | May 30, 2006 06:48pm | #34

            Well, your "2x6-1/2"ply-2x6-1/2"ply-2x6" is not a box beam.  I believe you had said a box beam was stronger than 2x6 headers.  Clearly three 2x6s and ply would be stronger than two 2x6s.

            A box beam is a box.     one 2 by on the flat, two on-edge verticles on top of that, and one 2 by on teh flat nailed on top of the on-edge 2bys.

            Curious?

          15. DoRight | May 30, 2006 06:50pm | #35

            So do teh two 2 bys on the flat add that much strenght to the doubled up on-edge 2 bys?  That is the question.

          16. wane | May 30, 2006 07:21pm | #36

            on their own the 2 by's that are horizontal don't provide much strength, but in a box beam, if nailed, will make the other vertically oriented headers work together ..

          17. DoRight | May 30, 2006 10:36pm | #37

            Not sure that is true for a header.  Now if you have say a knee wall or something, framed with 2 by stock it is very weak as a beam. (Don't ask why I would make a knee wall a box beam, jsut an example) Sheet it will plywood and becomes a box beam.  Due to all the nailing and perhaps gluing the ply to all the studs, teh studs become immoble, and the plywood loses most of it's flex.  Much like an I-beam.  Very strong. 

            Now this would be less true if the framed knee wall were only six or eight or ten inches high.  I say this only as a comparison to the idea of placing flat 2 x stock on top and bottom of a doubled header which is only six or eight inches high.

            I think there is a difference.

            Would be interested to hear from a real engineer.

          18. User avater
            zachariah | May 31, 2006 03:33am | #38

            where is your cape captain obvious.My stance is exactly opposite.Of course a solid beam is stronger than a box beam,I do not use a 2x6 top and bottom on a solid beam.

          19. DoRight | May 27, 2006 02:55am | #30

            Ever have trouble keeping the insulation dry during construction?

            If open time was expected to be long would you use foam (stuff you buy in 4 x 8 sheets)?

    3. doodabug | May 20, 2006 02:25am | #11

      I do like you do and add a 2 1/2 rip of 2x to bottom of header.

  2. JonE | May 19, 2006 09:13pm | #6

    I did a couple in my house that were overkill but worked fine - basically 3x 2x6 and 2 pieces of 1/2" ply.  Other idea would be to rip a 2x to 2-1/2" wide and make a box header.  Either way is more work than a 2x4 header.

     

    1. JohnSprung | May 19, 2006 09:53pm | #7

      > Other idea would be to rip a 2x to 2-1/2" wide and make a box header.

      Here you can buy 2x3 that's already that size. 

      Going with three two by's plus an inch of ply may have been overkill.  But depending on the span, loads, and depth of the header, going with two two by's might also be underkill in some cases.  Given that there's no engineer taking responsibility for the design, the next thing to check out is whether the AHJ has a xeroxed handout of generic details and acceptable spans.  The easy way to make the inspectors happy is to ask first and build once.

       

       

      -- J.S.

       

      Edited 5/19/2006 2:55 pm ET by JohnSprung

  3. User avater
    JourneymanCarpenterT | May 21, 2006 08:45am | #19

         First, if there’s a 2x on the flat underneath two 2x’s nailed together on edge; it doesn’t matter if the cripples are floating.  3” will be enough bearing.  The drywall will fasten just fine, as standard screw spacing in the field is 12” – 16”.  Therefore, the 2xs on edge can be 2x6, or even 2x12.  This principle holds true for a 2x3 butted into the side of the 2xs at the bottom as well.

     

         Second, box beam headers are very strong.  I don’t know what your inspector thinks, but if he tells you different, I guarantee you he’s wrong.  And no, wood is not a very good insulator.  It’s a good idea to insulate a box beam, that’s usually what they’re intended for.

     

         Finally, third:  Seeing as how your goal apparently is not energy efficiency, but “ideas that are quick and cost efficient,” use a 4x6.  Problem solved.  As for making the inspector happy, if the yo-yo doesn’t believe what I’m telling you, show him all the tables in the IRC and IBC codebooks that agree with me.

    -T

    1. User avater
      zachariah | May 21, 2006 03:08pm | #20

      I agree that box beams are strong and will do the trick for small spans, but I personally would not span more than 4 ft. with one where roof is loading, inspector or not. And if wood is a poor insulator are standard headers in 2x4 walls a problem, and if so what is the best way to adress this issue?

      1. User avater
        JourneymanCarpenterT | May 21, 2006 04:43pm | #21

             I wouldn’t say that “standard headers” in a 2x4 wall are a problem, but oversized headers could unnecessarily hinder energy efficiency.  Oversized headers are also an unnecessary expense and unnecessary extra weight in installation.

        <!----><!----> <!---->

             Since two 2xs on edge only leave a ½” gap in a 2x4 wall, there’s not much more you can do besides sizing the headers properly.  If speed as well as cost efficiency are your primary concerns, a 4x4 would be sufficient for most openings.  If you’re not so concerned about the cost of the header, but would rather have speed (already assembled, light weight, and tall enough to eliminate cripples) as well as superior energy efficiency, you can purchase engineered insulated headers made by Superior Wood Systems.  They make headers for both 2x4 and 2x6 walls.-T

        1. User avater
          zachariah | May 21, 2006 11:29pm | #22

          thanx for the info, I will compare price to conventional with assembly time included.I have wanted to start installing engineered headers to skirt both issues anyway.

      2. DoRight | May 27, 2006 02:58am | #31

        Wood is a relatively poor insulator.  If you are worried about the headers being a poor insulated point, start worrying about all the studs in the walls.  Same problem there.  Just the way the world is.  At least with the headers you can insulate teh space.

  4. pkuniacke | May 25, 2006 10:54pm | #24

    I just did a project on the North Shore of Massachusetts.  Its a three story, 3 coat stucco exterior const. over 2x6 @12" o.c.  The structural engineer (who is an old timer) specified an insulated sandwich box header that you purchase in lengths like an LVL (I think) and cut on site to match your R.O.'s.  It is made up of LVL-type stock as the bread and EPS as the meat of the sandwich.  Its custom fit for the 5 1/2" dimension.  Awesome product for northern climates I thought because of the classic difficulty with providing continuous insulation at sills, headers and rim joists.

    1. ChrisV | May 25, 2006 11:20pm | #25

      Thanks all for the ideas. In the end I went with box beam headers 2 2x6 (or 2x8) on edge pushed to the outside & inside with 2x6's on flat on top/bottom of the header. In my first post, it might of sounded like I was trying to do a quick and dirty solution for these headers, but I wasn't. My method of blocking and rips of plywood just seemed to labor intensive and I figured there had to be a more efficient way of getting there.

       I will need to do some research on the pre-made headers. It's tough to get some of the more sophisticated building materials in AZ, builders out here cut as many corners as possible and they don't place an emphasis on sealing a building as builders might on the coasts. I disagree with them on this as I prefer to keep the heat out and the cool air in as much as possible (or vise versa).

       

       

    2. User avater
      BossHog | May 26, 2006 04:03pm | #27

      "The structural engineer (who is an old timer) specified an insulated sandwich box header that you purchase in lengths like an LVL (I think) and cut on site to match your R.O.'s."

      Were they something like these?

      http://www.swi-joist.com/p_04.htm

      The pictures on the website aren't very good. But they have an insulated core like you mentioned.

      I'm a big fan of these, and used them in the "Spec House from Hell".
      It is not the size of the encounter but the content of its meaning.

      1. xosder11 | May 26, 2006 05:11pm | #28

        Boss,
        Those insulated headers should become the norm. They are strong, insulated, require no modificationn to match the thickness of the wall, and virtually no site fabrication other than cut to length.

        1. User avater
          BossHog | May 26, 2006 05:38pm | #29

          You're preachin' to the choir here - I also think a great deal of them. The last place I worked at even used them in panelized walls. We figured that by the time we assembled 2X12 headers with plywood in them, they were almost as much as the insulated headers. But aside from the wall panels, they never did really catch on with builders.
          If opportunity doesn't knock build a door. [Milton Berle]

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

Pros of Apprenticeship Programs

Apprenticeship programs can be a valuable tool for residential builders to recruit, train, and retain skilled employees, offering a structured pathway for career advancement and equity in the trades.

Featured Video

Builder’s Advocate: An Interview With Viewrail

Learn more about affordable, modern floating stairs, from design to manufacturing to installation.

Related Stories

  • Tools and Gear for the Moms Who Get it Done
  • Beat the Heat: Cool Innovations
  • A Practical Approach to Exterior Insulation
  • Making and Installing Wood Wall Paneling

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2024
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers
  • Issue 327 - November 2024
    • Repairing Damaged Walls and Ceilings
    • Plumbing Protection
    • Talking Shop

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

  • Home Group
  • Antique Trader
  • Arts & Crafts Homes
  • Bank Note Reporter
  • Cabin Life
  • Cuisine at Home
  • Fine Gardening
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Green Building Advisor
  • Garden Gate
  • Horticulture
  • Keep Craft Alive
  • Log Home Living
  • Military Trader/Vehicles
  • Numismatic News
  • Numismaster
  • Old Cars Weekly
  • Old House Journal
  • Period Homes
  • Popular Woodworking
  • Script
  • ShopNotes
  • Sports Collectors Digest
  • Threads
  • Timber Home Living
  • Traditional Building
  • Woodsmith
  • World Coin News
  • Writer's Digest
Active Interest Media logo
X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 81%

Subscribe

Enjoy unlimited access to Fine Homebuilding. Join Now

Already a member? Log in

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in

Privacy Policy Update

We use cookies, pixels, script and other tracking technologies to analyze and improve our service, to improve and personalize content, and for advertising to you. We also share information about your use of our site with third-party social media, advertising and analytics partners. You can view our Privacy Policy here and our Terms of Use here.

Cookies

Analytics

These cookies help us track site metrics to improve our sites and provide a better user experience.

Advertising/Social Media

These cookies are used to serve advertisements aligned with your interests.

Essential

These cookies are required to provide basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website.

Delete My Data

Delete all cookies and associated data