FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

AIA A107-1997

DLightbourn | Posted in Business on August 4, 2003 05:28am

Hi All!

I am in the process of bidding on an upcoming two-story residential project – 4,000 sq ft concrete, cmu, trussed roof etc.  I am confident in my bid, and my ability to complete the project to everyones satisfaction, BUT…. this is an AIA A107-1997 Stipulated Sum Contract…and the 1″ thick contract and specifications manual is a bit intimidating.

This will be my first AIA Contract since starting on my own, I’ve managed projects under this type of contract in the past, but it feels a WHOLE lot different when it’s your name on the dotted line!

Any advice on this particular contract type, pitfalls etc. that I should look out for would be greatly appreciated.

Dennis


Edited 8/5/2003 6:46:19 AM ET by Dennis

Reply
  • X
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • pinterest
  • email
  • add to favorites Log in or Sign up to save your favorite articles

Replies

  1. Schelling | Aug 05, 2003 02:17pm | #1

    I too was intimidated the first time I got one of those inch plus books. It is important to read one of those cover to cover at least once. About ten percent of the document is vitally important in that it tells you important information about the project, schedule, price, materials to be used, your responsibilities and the responsibilities of the owner and architect.

    More important than the document is the actual expectations of the owner and architect. For instance, we have never been asked to submit shop drawings on a single project despite the fact that this was called for in every contract.

    The architect is given broad authority to approve any change in the plans but often is too busy to understand and the many problems that need to be addressed during construction. Unless the architect can visit the site on a weekly basis or is close enough to pop in on short notice, the GC is often left on his own. If the owner is close at hand, they often make the decisions themselves despite the procedure set forth in the contract.

    I realize that mine is just another uninformed opinion. Maybe we can get some input from someone who has followed the boilerplate to the letter. Large commercial contractors do this all the time, I'm sure. It is rare in residential work.

    1. User avater
      rjw | Aug 05, 2003 02:23pm | #2

      More important than the document is the actual expectations of the owner and architect.

      IMHO, that are some of the best advice I've ever read here!

      (Actually, a primary function of a contract it to help the parties to the deal lay and detail out their expectations for that very reason - boiler plate achieves deal efficiencies, but at the cost of mudding up expectation clarification.)

      _______________________

      10 .... I have laid the foundation like an expert builder. Now others are building on it. But whoever is building on this foundation must be very careful.

      11 For no one can lay any other foundation than the one we already have--Jesus Christ.

      1 Corinthians 3:10-11

    2. DLightbourn | Aug 06, 2003 01:43pm | #3

      Hi Schellingm!

      Thank you for your thoughts.  I called the architect yesterday expressed my concerns.  He said that most of the provisions in the Specifications were part of his "standard package" of specs, cut-and-pasted from previous jobs.  He said that on jobs of this size, he will not require the concrete samples, mock-ups, shop drawings or the 300 sq ft air-conditioned site office!

      He was not willing, however to remove these requirements from the specifications "just in case".  I think I will up my contingency % a few points as well...."just in case".

      Thanks again,

      Dennis

      1. Schelling | Aug 06, 2003 02:13pm | #4

        ".  I think I will up my contingency % a few points as well...."just in case"."

        This is often the main result of a thick contract and spec book but the owner is usually more than willing to pay for this.

        1. User avater
          BillHartmann | Aug 06, 2003 04:24pm | #7

          "This is often the main result of a thick contract and spec book but the owner is usually more than willing to pay for this."

          What?

          How many owners are willing to pay an extra 10% for concrete core test that is never done, and if done really not needed, and for an airconditioned office that is never used.

          1. Schelling | Aug 07, 2003 02:31am | #13

            "How many owners are willing to pay an extra 10% for concrete core test that is never done, and if done really not needed, and for an airconditioned office that is never used. "

            What they are paying for (probably not 10%, but could be) is a document drawn up by a neutral party which puts bidders on an equal footing. I can't ever remember using this contract in a job that was not bid out. The owners are hoping that the extra cost caused by  this document will add to the likelihood that the project will have few problems. It may help but ultimately the success of the job will be determined by the folks designing, building and paying for the job.

      2. User avater
        rjw | Aug 06, 2003 02:52pm | #5

        He was not willing, however to remove these requirements from the specifications "just in case".  I think I will up my contingency % a few points as well...."just in case".

        Make a written record of the conversation - "Memo to File" and file it with you project docs and send a copy to him "FYI"

        "Just in Case" Courets will generally not enforce contract provisions which the parties really didn't intend to be part of the contract -his memorialized oral waiver will buy you a lot of peace of mind - "just in case."

        After the project is done, you might want to mention to him in a friendly, just in case sort of way how obnoxious his "just in case" attitude is - he's basically saying, "I want that stuff in the cointract just in case I want to start a fight."

        _______________________

        10 .... I have laid the foundation like an expert builder. Now others are building on it. But whoever is building on this foundation must be very careful.

        11 For no one can lay any other foundation than the one we already have--Jesus Christ.

        1 Corinthians 3:10-11

    3. FastEddie1 | Aug 06, 2003 03:04pm | #6

      It is important to read one of those cover to cover at least once.  Thta is excellent advice.  The contractor is quite likely to find conflicts between the spec book and the plans, and somewhere it might say that one supercedes the other, but it would be worth bringing the error to the architects (and possibly customers) attention.  The spec book might specify a particular brand of paint or lockset, define the required number of coats of paint, etc.  Depending on the size of the archy's offfice, one person may have done the spec book and a different person the plans, and sometimess they don't communicate.  Document all discrepancies in writing.

      Do it right, or do it twice.

  2. tek | Aug 06, 2003 05:12pm | #8

    Hi Dennis - As an architect, I've heard the same concerns you've voiced many times, often from contractors signing the A107 for the first time.  Take a look at the A101 and you'll feel better (the general conditions are about 1-in thick)!

    We use the A107 quite a bit and all I can say is that it is fair to everyone involved.  It doesn't favor anyone in particular.  Each party is defined along with their responsibility.  If they don't meet their responsibilities, there are provisions for action.  We've seen this document protect owners form less than stellar contractors and we've seen it protect contractors from rotten owners (they're out there).  But, that's just my experience.  Have a lawyer review it for you for your own peace of mind.

    As for the specifications, it drives me nuts when an architect is too lazy to edit his own specs.  For your own protection, include with your bid a list of exclusions: the job trailer, concrete testing, etc.  Make sure the list is referenced and included as part of the contract that you sign.

    Good luck!

    1. DLightbourn | Aug 06, 2003 07:50pm | #9

      I've worked with this architect on a couple of projects before, in fact I built his house last year, so I know him quite well.  I did not think that the overblown specs were a sign of laziness, I figured that he is just a bit overworked.

      After reading all of the posts above, I called him back.  He has asked me to document my concerns and note any discrepancies between the various documents.  He then plans to issue an amendment to all bidders, just to make it fair to us all.  I guess that this is one way for him to shed a bit of his workload!!!!!

      I will comply, because this job is right for us.  We can build this, we will get this job!

      Thank to ALL for your posts,

      Dennis

      Edited 8/6/2003 12:51:20 PM ET by Dennis

      1. BobKovacs | Aug 06, 2003 07:55pm | #10

        So, you're going to do all that work for him (his work, basically), and he's going to issue it as an addendum to all the other bidders???? NO WAY!!!!

        If the job is so "right" for you, either convince him of that (he obviously isn't convinced yet, since he's bidding the job to other GCs), or let everyone do their own quals to the contract as part of their proposals- the architect can  then sort out who excluded what.  Why should they all benefit from you doing the architect's legwork and making his plans/specs jive with each other, and with what he really wants??

        Bob

        1. FastEddie1 | Aug 06, 2003 09:01pm | #11

          Bob you're partially correct.  If a bidder asks for clarification of a spec or drawings, the archy is correct in passing the answer to all bidders; for example a steel beam that's not identified on the plans.  If a bidder finds an error in the palns or specs and advbises the archy, again it is prudent for the archy to advise everyone.  However, if one bidder doesn't see the need for a jobsite office trailer, that's his business and he should include a qualification with his proposal clearly stating that it is not part of the bid.

          Do it right, or do it twice.

          1. BobKovacs | Aug 06, 2003 09:16pm | #12

            I agree fully- in fact, I'm bidding a $55 million school (bid due tomorrow), which has generated over 500 RFI's from the various bidders, and 10 addendums.   This is annoying enough, in and of itself, in that is shows that the drawings were far from complete when issued, and the contractors are all filling in the gaps and inconsistencies.

            What Dennis has been asked to do goes even further, though.  This is not a matter of clarifying inconsistencies, but rather asking the contractor to tell the architect what's really needed to do the job (concrete testing on a residence is overkill in most cases, for example).  Why should one contractor be expected to review the specs, generate a list of what he feels is appropriate, and then have all the other contractors benefit from it?  Either they all put together their own quals and let the archy sort through them, or let the archy take the time to prepare supplemental conditions to supercede the AIA GC's, thereby avoiding having to sort through the various lists of quals.

            Bob

  3. DLightbourn | Sep 11, 2003 12:40am | #14

    Hi All!

    Just a quick update if anyones interested-

    Contractor A               $492,000

    Me                              494,500

    Contractor C                 498,000

    The "Winning" Bidder      422,000

    Contractor A and I were talking outside after the opening as the "winner" walked up.  We continued our conversation about the 60K worth of impact resistant windows and the 30K worth of stairs, all the while watching our boy get paler and paler!

    Was it Sonny that said that the worst outcome of these types of bids is to win by a large margin?  Whoever it was, he was waaaaay right.

    Dennis

    1. brownbagg | Sep 11, 2003 02:34am | #15

      around here he had a problem with people leaving money on the table, then change ordering. They got where they throw out the high and low bid and then go with past performance/price.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

FHB Podcast Segment: Finding Hazardous Materials in a Fixer-Upper

Look closely at these common locations for hazardous materials in older homes.

Featured Video

Micro-Adjust Deck-Baluster Spacing for an Eye-Deceiving Layout

No math, no measuring—just a simple jig made from an elastic band is all you need to lay out a good-looking deck railing.

Related Stories

  • Podcast Episode 693: Old-House Hazards, Building Larsen Trusses, AI in Construction
  • FHB Podcast Segment: Finding Hazardous Materials in a Fixer-Upper
  • A Classic Paint Sprayer Gets a Thoughtful Refresh
  • Podcast Episode 692: Introduction to Trade Work, Embodied Carbon, and Envelope Improvements

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 332 - July 2025
    • Custom Built-ins With Job-Site Tools
    • Fight House Fires Through Design
    • Making the Move to Multifamily
  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2025
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

  • Home Group
  • Antique Trader
  • Arts & Crafts Homes
  • Bank Note Reporter
  • Cabin Life
  • Cuisine at Home
  • Fine Gardening
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Green Building Advisor
  • Garden Gate
  • Horticulture
  • Keep Craft Alive
  • Log Home Living
  • Military Trader/Vehicles
  • Numismatic News
  • Numismaster
  • Old Cars Weekly
  • Old House Journal
  • Period Homes
  • Popular Woodworking
  • Script
  • ShopNotes
  • Sports Collectors Digest
  • Threads
  • Timber Home Living
  • Traditional Building
  • Woodsmith
  • World Coin News
  • Writer's Digest
Active Interest Media logo
X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

Enjoy unlimited access to Fine Homebuilding. Join Now

Already a member? Log in

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in

Privacy Policy Update

We use cookies, pixels, script and other tracking technologies to analyze and improve our service, to improve and personalize content, and for advertising to you. We also share information about your use of our site with third-party social media, advertising and analytics partners. You can view our Privacy Policy here and our Terms of Use here.

Cookies

Analytics

These cookies help us track site metrics to improve our sites and provide a better user experience.

Advertising/Social Media

These cookies are used to serve advertisements aligned with your interests.

Essential

These cookies are required to provide basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website.

Delete My Data

Delete all cookies and associated data