FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

AUTO CAD Layering Schedule

gdcarpenter | Posted in Business on March 12, 2009 02:31am

Hi All,

Currently taking an AUTO CAD course at the local Community College, have bit the bullet and obtained the AUTO CAD ’09 software.

Wondering if anyone would be willing to share insights or examples of preferred layering schedules vis a vis colors and line thickness. Have College’s ’08 program has 40 layers, sound about right?

Let’s not confuse the issue with facts!

Reply
  • X
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • pinterest
  • email
  • add to favorites Log in or Sign up to save your favorite articles

Replies

  1. FastEddie | Mar 12, 2009 02:42pm | #1

    My architect has about 50 that are standard.  Some drive me nuts.  Different layers for door jambs, door swing, headers, and sills.  Different layers for exterior window glazing, jambs, sills.  A lot of it makes sense if you stop and analyze, but it still makes for a lot of layers.  If you make up your own schedule, put a little thought into it.  I have seen where all the architectural feature layers start with AR and the electgrical layers start with EL etc.  Makes it easier to find if you remember the code.

    "Put your creed in your deed."   Emerson

    "When asked if you can do something, tell'em "Why certainly I can", then get busy and find a way to do it."  T. Roosevelt

  2. kdrab206 | Mar 12, 2009 03:00pm | #2

    I would recommend that if you are just starting to learn autocad that you focus more on learning the commands and how the program works, it is fairly complex.  Once you have a better grasp on the program you start to get into standard layer naming conventions, depending on the type of design work you are doing (civil, architectural, mechanical, etc.).

     

    Ideally all firms would follow the National CAD Standards (see http://www.buildingsmartalliance.org/ncs/ ), but the reality is that most firms have their own way of layer naming.

     

    I’d recommend joining http://www.augi.com (Autodesk User Group International).  They have forums covering everything related to Autocad, and it’s free.

     

    You can also download templates based on old standards (2.0) for free here: https://tsc.wes.army.mil/products/standards/aec/aecstdweb.asp

     

    Hope that helps.

     

    Trevor

     

    1. User avater
      gdcarpenter | Mar 12, 2009 03:42pm | #3

      Thanks all. Know I've got a bit to learn, but figured I would like to set up the layering once and as best as possible at the start. Looking forward to the exercise.Let's not confuse the issue with facts!

  3. User avater
    Jeff_Clarke | Mar 12, 2009 03:50pm | #4

    I have a different CAD system that I have been on since 1985 (not ACAD).   While you can set default values per layer that does, as described above, do weird things where in order to have a well-graded pen map you need different layers for every different pen - makes no sense and you can't make errors in which layer an item goes on.

    So I primarily use the color system (to allow for reasonable translation into ACAD) but nearly ignore default pen/color   /   layer.   A layer for windows, for instance, would have JUST the windows but could easily have 3-4 pen weights (and so what).

    Jeff



    Edited 3/12/2009 8:52 am ET by Jeff_Clarke

  4. susiekitchen | Mar 16, 2009 09:01pm | #5

    Been using AutoCad since '86 and my designer/architect employers and I have always set up our own layers and colors. Have used add-on software that likes to make its own gazillion layers, which drives me crazy!!

    Basically I went from overlay drafting on mylar to CAD, so the logical thing for me was to assign layers according to what I wanted to print.  I also give some consideration to what layers I would generally prefer to be frozen when I'm editing...like hatch patterns. If it's helpful to you in drafting to have door frames, doors, hardware, etc. on their own layers, then do it. But remember that the more needless layers you have, the more opportunity to get things wrong and often more time spent in editing. Also, I'm talking about drafting here, not using software to generate materials lists or the like for take-offs.

    Typical layers for the architecturals on a simple commercial design job I've done would be:

    Demo; New Partition; Existing Partition; Doors; Windows; Plumbing; Electrical; Reflected Ceiling Plan; Lighting (if not on ceiling plan); Dimensions; Notes; Floorcovering; Furniture; Equipment; Hatch; Section Marker; Layout

    I add layers to this list as needed, but I try to keep it simple. Details and sections have their own layers (Det1 or green, cyan, etc) based on line weights. Elevations have 1-3 layers depending on the complexity, and I don't bother using any of the others like Windows or Doors unless there's a specific reason I might need to turn them off.

    Once you've been drafting awhile and have had to generate finished drawings, you'll discover the logic behind the layers.

    BTW, be a courteous draftsman if you work on shared drawings. I worked with an architect that insisted on everything having its own layer (can't tell you how much fun editing is with Studs, Sheetrock, Hatch layers aplenty), but refused to put what he drew on the proper layer. The result was 20-40 minutes wasted re-assigning the geometry to the correct layer so you could print the drawings!

    1. User avater
      gdcarpenter | Mar 16, 2009 09:26pm | #6

      Thank you much, finally figured out how to import the layering schedule from the AUTO CAD 08 they are using at the College where I'm taking a course in AUTO CAD. At least that's a starting point, some 40 layers there.I can see the pros and cons of more versus fewer layers, will probably lean towards the more.Only took half a day to figure how to print to scale. This will be fun?Let's not confuse the issue with facts!

    2. FastEddie | Mar 16, 2009 10:17pm | #7

      I use very similar layers to whta you list, with a couple of additions: title block, poche, and notes.  Sometimes more is not better.  I too have worked with drawings that have separate layers for wall framing, sheetrock, headers, etc, and it just gets too time consuming.  especially when you freeze a layer, and find out that not everything is where it's supposed to be.

      Another pet peeve of mine is when someone creates a block on a layer other than zero, and assigns a specific color."Put your creed in your deed."   Emerson

      "When asked if you can do something, tell'em "Why certainly I can", then get busy and find a way to do it."  T. Roosevelt

      1. susiekitchen | Mar 17, 2009 05:37am | #11

        Another pet peeve of mine is when someone creates a block on a layer other than zero, and assigns a specific color

        Yeah, let's just smack these folks a good one! I sometimes slip up and put my wblocks on a layer other than 0, and my Lite version doesn't have the Lxplode or the other layer macros. So, it's a real pain to change those. I'm going to have to update soon anyway, so maybe I can afford the full package.

        Also don't have the "join" command I had on the full version. If I remember, it's not a feature with ACAD but something our tech guy got from one of the many chat groups. Amazing how you don't realize how valuable those commands are until you're without them.

  5. User avater
    CapnMac | Mar 17, 2009 01:37am | #8

    Ah, layers.  As much fun as colors.  Which then magically drived plotting.

    There is a variable, MAXSORT which defines the number of items sorted alphabetically in ACAD lists.  The default is 200; depending on version/platform, 500 is also used (especially with the stinking AIA-long layer scheme).

    The shortest answer is that there is no standard for naming or color use.  Anyone who tells you different needs to get off the pipe and get out more.

    Now, color has been used for the last two decades to sort out eventual line weight, and to group items of a similar nature.  Displayable lineweight has only been around for 6-8 years, so it really has not made a big change in things.

    As to naming, you are limited to a mere 640 some-odd characters per layer name--so I tend to be obvious, and verbose.  No longer do we have to puzzle out A-Arch-Fl-otl, instead we can just call that Floor Plan outline and be done with it.

    How many layers do you need?  Don't know it can vary.  Without counting, my stock, blank, floor plan drawing probably has 65-75 layers in it.  Which is much better than the 200-something confusingly redundant AIA scheme . . .

    Occupational hazard of my occupation not being around (sorry Bubba)
    1. mike_maines | Mar 17, 2009 04:12am | #9

      We keep maybe 40 or so layers drawing to drawing.  Each new drawing is a copy/paste of the previous project. 

      If we want a detail from an old drawing we often cut-and-paste it in, along with its layer name.  Occasionally do a PURGE to get rid of layers and blocks we're not using. 

      We do keep a few DETL pens (detail pens, to those not Autocad-hip) handy for elevations.  Rarely a need to change properties of lines on an elevation, so those are simply drafted with colors representing lineweights.  Floor plans get the full array of available layers.  Other pages are X-REF'd in as needed. 

      For example, on an electrical plan, X-REF the floor plan in on its own layer, turn off text layers, turn the other layers to gray.  Then the electrical plan shows better on the drawing.

      Sorry Cap'n, you probably know all this, should have addressed it to the OP.  How're things in Texas?  I haven't been on Facebook lately.

      1. User avater
        CapnMac | Mar 17, 2009 09:59am | #12

        Sorry Cap'n, you probably know all this, should have addressed it to the OP.  How're things in Texas?  I haven't been on Facebook lately.

        Yeah, could teach some of this stuff, but no one pays teachers enough.

        Is what it is.  Just like being on f/b.  All works out in the end.

        Oh, and XREF's really ought to be attached to Layer XREF in the drawing--this works out so much better.  Drawings used as XREFs need simple names, as that name gets appended to everything used in the drawing afterwards--which is critical when some dufus later explodes the XREF into the drawing (Just Say Noooooooooo!)Occupational hazard of my occupation not being around (sorry Bubba)

        1. User avater
          Jeff_Clarke | Mar 17, 2009 02:47pm | #13

          What's a real pleasure is working with software that doesn't require xrefs - by allowing for databases with multiple drawings.

          Jeff

          1. User avater
            CapnMac | Mar 17, 2009 10:38pm | #15

            software that doesn't require xrefs

            ACAD does not require xrefs.

            Some drafting practices work better with them-some work better without.

            As with all things touched by the human condition, there are those who can improve or un-improve the process used.Occupational hazard of my occupation not being around (sorry Bubba)

          2. User avater
            Jeff_Clarke | Mar 17, 2009 10:48pm | #17

            To clarify, AutoCAD is really set up for single drawing files = .dwg

            The software that I use is set up for databases that contain multiple drawings including a master drawing with all layers.

            So, for instance, if you want to line up 1st 2nd 3rd floor drawings, or stretch all at one time, you can (without external anything - it's all in the same database).

            For instance, a site plan within the database doesn't have a separate outline of a building, it uses the actual 1st floor plan (for example) as the footprint.

            There are many advantages to this -

             

            Jeff

            Edited 3/17/2009 3:49 pm ET by Jeff_Clarke

          3. [email protected] | Mar 18, 2009 02:55am | #18

            That is what the views in Autocad are used for. You can turn on and off various layers in a view, with out effecting the other views or the model itself. The thing I wish it did, (and it may, and I haven't figured it out yet), is let me change the layer colors by view. I just started using the 2009 version, after sticking with 2006 since it came out. So, I'm guessing there may be things that I don't know about. Maybe, I'll have time to get some training in before things get busy this summer.

          4. User avater
            Jeff_Clarke | Mar 18, 2009 04:35am | #19

            Trust me ... I have both ARRIS and Autocad and it isn't the same structure at all.

            ARRIS also has the MCI - Motion Control Interpreter - it allows you to custom program mouse gestures to commands - in other words you hold down a button and move (gesture) the mouse in one of 16 patterns (easily memorizable) and it executes any sequence of menu picks or commands that you'd like to program (or a standard set that 'comes with').

            You'd find it hard to believe how fast you can fly with this ;o)

            Jeff

            Edited 3/17/2009 9:36 pm ET by Jeff_Clarke

          5. User avater
            CapnMac | Mar 18, 2009 04:46am | #20

            is let me change the layer colors by view

            Nope.  Layer color is set.  It's "built" like other ACAD Entities, as a list of parameters.  The GUI, which includes views, responds to the parameters of each entity.  Which is how individual View(port)s can filter Layers on demand. 

            Sausolito allegedly studied filtering by other parameter sets, like color or linetype, but, apparently, that confused CIOs and CTOs, who are now the sole marketing target group Autodsek seems to care about.

            If you are intending to have a skewed VPort showing a axonometric view, that can get complicated with constructs as complicated as a house.  Can be exciting with something as simple as a 3" butt hinge, for that matter. 

            What can help in that situation is to add layers.  For a butt hinge, Left Leaf; Right Leaf, Pin; Screws, would be a good start.  (Please to not start your 3d modleing with wood screws--spiral surfaces are the most complicated simple structure there is, and a wood screw has them on a tapered shaft, under fun as a learning example.)Occupational hazard of my occupation not being around (sorry Bubba)

        2. FastEddie | Mar 17, 2009 04:04pm | #14

          My architect will send me a drawing file that has xref's, but he forgets to send the xref with it.  Since his computer automatically reaches out and finds it, he thinks mine will too."Put your creed in your deed."   Emerson

          "When asked if you can do something, tell'em "Why certainly I can", then get busy and find a way to do it."  T. Roosevelt

          1. User avater
            CapnMac | Mar 17, 2009 10:43pm | #16

            Since his computer automatically reaches out and finds it, he thinks mine will too.

            Works every time he tries it--your machine must be "broken" <g>

            Had a boss who used a laptop, he used to gripe about all sorts of network connections.  That is, until we just mapped an on/offline drive letter to match.

            My fave is when you get sent the drawing and the only point-of-contact at the other end is the person--and they only know how to push the buttons they have been shown.  Which can be really spiffy when there are multiple circular references in the file they have sent--and some number of them are missing . . . <sigh>Occupational hazard of my occupation not being around (sorry Bubba)

    2. [email protected] | Mar 17, 2009 05:05am | #10

      CapnMac, I disagree: Autocad release 11, and I think even 10, would support line weights by layer. (I used to do everything in weighted black lines on a white screen, which of course drove the guys I worked with bonkers.) I started out in cad back in the days of monochrome monitors, and single pen plotters. Line weights were there then. Then, when 16-color graphics systems, and the eight pen plotters, showed up, everyone started using the first 8 colors in the autocad pallet, to correspond to the pens, and assigning line weights fell out of style. Now Autocad is trying to get people to shift back to line weight in the display, and not having any luck. Anyway, enough steeling of the thread. The OP should use the layers standard his school has for now, and understand that other places use different standards. I have worked places that had nearly insane levels of layer standards, and places that had none. There have been several attempts to develop industry wide cad standards, but it has been a tough road to go down. In part because large users that have developed their own standards are reluctant to buy in, due to the problems they perceive that will cause with their legacy drawings.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

FHB Podcast Segment: Efficient HVAC for a New Build

Self-installing an HVAC system requires a lot of thought and planning.

Featured Video

How to Install Cable Rail Around Wood-Post Corners

Use these tips to keep cables tight and straight for a professional-looking deck-railing job.

Related Stories

  • Podcast Episode 686: Brick Steps, Ground-Source Heat Pumps, and Greenhouses in Nova Scotia
  • FHB Podcast Segment: Efficient HVAC for a New Build
  • Affordable Scans, Accurate Plans
  • FHB Summit 2025 — Design, Build, Business

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2024
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers
  • Issue 327 - November 2024
    • Repairing Damaged Walls and Ceilings
    • Plumbing Protection
    • Talking Shop

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

  • Home Group
  • Antique Trader
  • Arts & Crafts Homes
  • Bank Note Reporter
  • Cabin Life
  • Cuisine at Home
  • Fine Gardening
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Green Building Advisor
  • Garden Gate
  • Horticulture
  • Keep Craft Alive
  • Log Home Living
  • Military Trader/Vehicles
  • Numismatic News
  • Numismaster
  • Old Cars Weekly
  • Old House Journal
  • Period Homes
  • Popular Woodworking
  • Script
  • ShopNotes
  • Sports Collectors Digest
  • Threads
  • Timber Home Living
  • Traditional Building
  • Woodsmith
  • World Coin News
  • Writer's Digest
Active Interest Media logo
X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

Enjoy unlimited access to Fine Homebuilding. Join Now

Already a member? Log in

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in

Privacy Policy Update

We use cookies, pixels, script and other tracking technologies to analyze and improve our service, to improve and personalize content, and for advertising to you. We also share information about your use of our site with third-party social media, advertising and analytics partners. You can view our Privacy Policy here and our Terms of Use here.

Cookies

Analytics

These cookies help us track site metrics to improve our sites and provide a better user experience.

Advertising/Social Media

These cookies are used to serve advertisements aligned with your interests.

Essential

These cookies are required to provide basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website.

Delete My Data

Delete all cookies and associated data