A guy tries to convince me that turning off florescent lights and then turning them back on uses more energy than just leaving them on. He said that when they flicker they are warming up and this takes more energy than when they have reached a steady state. Now I am not talking abought turning them on an off in seconds or even minutes.
This seems like a bunch of nonsense but I am not 100% sure. Any thought/facts?
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story

Lighting up an exterior isn't just about ambiance— it's also about code compliance. Here is what the code says about safety and efficiency when it comes to outdoor lighting.
Featured Video
Video: Build a Fireplace, Brick by BrickHighlights
Fine Homebuilding Magazine
- Home Group
- Antique Trader
- Arts & Crafts Homes
- Bank Note Reporter
- Cabin Life
- Cuisine at Home
- Fine Gardening
- Fine Woodworking
- Green Building Advisor
- Garden Gate
- Horticulture
- Keep Craft Alive
- Log Home Living
- Military Trader/Vehicles
- Numismatic News
- Numismaster
- Old Cars Weekly
- Old House Journal
- Period Homes
- Popular Woodworking
- Script
- ShopNotes
- Sports Collectors Digest
- Threads
- Timber Home Living
- Traditional Building
- Woodsmith
- World Coin News
- Writer's Digest
Replies
Depending on how much you pay for electricity, if you're coming back within 15 or 20 minutes, leave them on. If you're going to be gone longer than that turn them off. This link explains:
http://lightingdesignlab.com/articles/switching/switching_fluorescent.htm
Thanks, just what I was looking for.
it will also burned them out quicker, we got some in our shop that never been turned off and there close to ten years old.