I am planning to build a new home on the Olympic peninsula of Washington state. The average rain fall is 17″ and the property is on the edge of a flood plain. A civil engineer has surveyed the property and has said that a 36″ foundation would put the house above the 100 year flood level.
My concern with using a foundation is removal of water from the crawl space and the problems of moulds and mildew. I am leaning toward concrete caissons but no one can or will tell me what the cost differential is between the two.
Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you. D.A. Meyer
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story
With the right approach, you can restore old hardware—whether through soaking, scrubbing, or polishing—giving it a fresh look while preserving its original charm.
Highlights
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Replies
Why don't you call a cassion contractor and a concrete contractor and get some estimates? Caissons are usually more expensive, especially if they need to be drilled very deep- the equipment is costly. The best way to find out is to call the local contractors.
Bob
why not install a theromastically controlled dehumidefier in the cral space along with a sump pump and french drainage system. Its actually not all that expensive to do as long as you're building new anyway.
BE a dry well
andy
My life is my practice!
http://CLIFFORDRENOVATIONS.COM
Thank you for your response. I have thought of a french drain but the property is practically level. I have no place to which I can run the water.
Another idea might be to go with the foundation and fill it up wth sand to grade then pour a 2"ground seal on top of a vapour barrier and stil have 2 and half feet or so for a crawl, your only moisture concerns would be in flood season.maybe
........Rik..........
Where is the water?
Dealing with a flood plain refers to the ten year and the hundred year water levels in flood conditions. The foundation issues you adress are more concerned with ground water which would seep to this foundation on a continual basis.
To answer your Q, you need to know where the level of the ground water is.
If it is near the surface, then a foundation hole will be just a large well for it to seep into.
Our ground water level here fluctuates about seven feet in the seaasons so it would not be continually below all the time here. We waterproof the cellar and use perimeter drains to lead to daylight. If your site is too level, then you would want to use a sump poump to send it out at least a hundred feet. You would need to have an idea of the volumn of water to design sumps to work.
You will need to do grading immediately around the house anyway to lead surface water off
Gravel soils will let water run to your foundation faster. Clay soils will slow movement of water more.
A builder or engineer would need more information than this to design around the variables. A local guy will probably be able to give a thimbnail idea off top of his head form past experience.
Excellence is its own reward!
I would also see where the 500 year flood level is.
And while not raise the house to the 500 year level move it up somewhat.
From what I have seen around here those numbers are not always to be trusted.
I know of a guy that built a house in Texas that the whole first "floor" and maybe a little more is part of the flood plane.
The whole thing was a couple of storeys of concrete if I remember correctly and the first floor was a garage with an elevator (passengar) that could be parked in the upper levels.
I think that the lower level(s) where all sealed concrete, etc. Very serious flood area.
Don't know your situation but you may consider going above the 100 year flood level. A few $ spent raising your new home can be a wise investment when the water's at your foundations. We live near the Missouri and it seems we have 100 year level floods every few years.