Hydronic heat control via programmable thermostat
Tough question:
Is there a programmable thermostat (heat only) available that would work with my hydronic heat system?
My system:
Hydronic heat through 5 loops treated as one zone. Heat source is a seperate coil within my water heater. I installed an RP-1 panel myself and it came with a standard thermostat that is wired with phone line connections. The current thermostat controls one pump. The system works well, but I think I’m missing out on some savings that I could get with a programmable thermostat.
So, is there a programmable thermostat that would work well with this system? Would I have to rewire in some way to install one? It would be nice if I didn’t have to get a thermostat that requires batteries.
Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
Replies
Probably
I'm just guessing, that the thermostat you have is a 24-Volt unit. Get a multi meter and check if it isn't printed on the unit.
If so you should be able to use almost any 24-volt thermostat.
Yes - 24V AC, 60Hz
It is 24V AC. Then I wonder about wiring a new thermostat. As I said, it's actually wired with telephone connections. Do I just cut the telephone connection off of the thermostat end, strip the wired and apply to the new thermostat? I'm not certain how to determine which wires get connected to the new thermostat.
Have you opened the thromostat?
I'd suggest opening up your thermostat and check to see what wiring scheme it has internally. Check to see what wire on the phone cord is doing what inside.
I'm just guessing, but you should have: a red wire, which is the 24-Volt "hot"; a brown, white or black which is the 24-volt "nuetral"; and, a white or green which is the heat call.
Regardless, you need to determine what wires on the phone jack do what.
Once you know that, I'd recommend you go to Radio Shack and get a female phone jack and build a base to mount the thermostat to, that you can insert and crimp the required wires into. This is just because I have never had much luck stripping phone cord wiring.
Yep, opened thermostat.
OK, opened the thermostat. I tracked down the model number and found this schematic. I've attached the Operation manual. I have a Microtemp MTD 3999. It does not have a floor sensor or remote switch.
I like your idea about the phone jack connection, but since I opened the thermostat, I now know that the thermostat has terminal screws that I can loosen to get the wiring free to connect to a new thermostat.
The more I look at this thing, the more I want a different one. To get the unit open, you have to remove the temp setting dial to remove a hidden screw. To put the dial back on, you have to know what the room temperature is at that given time. Not a good system!
Very helpful so far. What do you think now?
If it's a standard 24V 2-wire thermostat then basically any standard thermostat can be used.
However, some digital thermostats do not work and play well with hydronic systems because they can't deal with the slow response of a hydronic system. So be sure to examine the package for any message such as "Not recommended for hydronic heating systems."
The other problem you may encounter is that you might not have a 2-wire setup. I believe some hydronic systems need a thermostat with an extra set of contacts (and a 3rd or 4th wire) so that it can operate the burner and the pump motor separately.
Not a two wire
It doesn't appear to be a 2 wire to me. It doesn't operate a burner either though. It only controls the pump. The pump sends the water throught the system which includes a seperate coil that runs through my water heater.
Actually, I believe you could replace it with a standard unit, but you'd give up the floor sensor function. Basically, cap off all the wires except those going to 2 and 3, and wire the new stat to those two wires.
Maybe?
I don't have the floor sensor, so that's not a concern for me.
Could you explain the circuit by wiring only to terminals 2 and 3? Terminal 2 is neutral and 3 is part of the dry contact?
I apparently misspoke -- it would be the wires on 3 and 4 that you would use.
I see
Makes sense now. Thanks for the help. Much appreciated.