In New Hampshire and Massachusetts, most concrete foundation walls are about 8″ or 10″ thick and mudsill used on the wall is usually in 2×6 size. The weight load on the wall is then only on 1/2 to 2/3 side the wall. Why don’t we use 2×8 or 2×10 to evenly distribute the weight on total top surface of the wall?
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story

From building boxes and fitting face frames to installing doors and drawers, these techniques could be used for lots of cabinet projects.
Highlights
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Fine Homebuilding Magazine
- Home Group
- Antique Trader
- Arts & Crafts Homes
- Bank Note Reporter
- Cabin Life
- Cuisine at Home
- Fine Gardening
- Fine Woodworking
- Green Building Advisor
- Garden Gate
- Horticulture
- Keep Craft Alive
- Log Home Living
- Military Trader/Vehicles
- Numismatic News
- Numismaster
- Old Cars Weekly
- Old House Journal
- Period Homes
- Popular Woodworking
- Script
- ShopNotes
- Sports Collectors Digest
- Threads
- Timber Home Living
- Traditional Building
- Woodsmith
- World Coin News
- Writer's Digest
Replies
Why should you? Concrete distributes weight far better than wood.
4-5" of bearing is plenty for any floor joist. Joist hangers only have 1-1/2-2".
Matt
Why don't we use 2x4 and save a few bucks on lumber?
Trying to get foundation subs to hit a 2x4 right on here is a small miracle.
That would also put the J-bolts really close to the edge of the poured wall. Possible cracking in the future.
Matt
Good explanation why we want to use 2x6 instead of 2x4, thank you. But I still feel that a house sits on the foundation walls only partially through 2x6 mudsill. It's like I sit on a chair but only sit on part of the chair.
Think of it this way: It would make more sense to use a concrete piece to bear the weight -- it's a lot stiffer than wood and will spread the weight out over a wider area. Then consider that the top few inches of the foundation are indeed that concrete piece -- the mudsill just provides a convenient way to attach the framing.
So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable Creature, since it enables one to find or make a Reason for everything one has a mind to do. --Benjamin Franklin
I agree, if a concrete block is 7 1/2" wide, why wouldn't you use a 2x8 that fits perfect over the block? Looks better too over a 2x6 . Use the 2x8,no inspector in their right mind would fail the work.
7.5 concrete blocks?
Uhhh, yeah.
Don't know about CA, but in DE if I ask at the yard for 8" block it will actually measure 7-1/2" to 7-5/8" depending on which manufacturer.
Mortar joint takes it to 8" gain in hieght. Nobody sweats the width so 7-1/2" or so with no parging added.
Jim
Never underestimate the value of a sharp pencil or good light.
No need to reinvent the wheel brother. If all these 10" pours with 2x6 sills start crumbling then we'll revisit it at that time. But I ain't holding my breath.
You have a nice philosophy there :-)
Hey Joe,
Heard you were dealing with R yesterday...can you post something to me so we can doublecheck that everything is in order now? Thanks, sorry for the trouble.
Justin Fink - FHB Editorial
"Everybody wants to know what I’m on...
What am I on? I’m on my bike, busting my ass 6 hours a day…
...What are you on?"
- Lance Armstrong
Can you read this?Joe Carola
Yup, everything is back to normal. Thanks for your patience while I was out of the office.Justin Fink - FHB Editorial
"Everybody wants to know what I’m on...
What am I on? I’m on my bike, busting my ass 6 hours a day…
...What are you on?"
- Lance Armstrong
Thank You, Justin.Joe Carola
Is this the thread you emailed about? Alot of replies/posts got deleted. I didn't get anything on my end. Sorry for getting to this so late.
Matt