FHB Logo Facebook LinkedIn Email Pinterest Twitter X Instagram Tiktok YouTube Plus Icon Close Icon Navigation Search Icon Navigation Search Icon Arrow Down Icon Video Guide Icon Article Guide Icon Modal Close Icon Guide Search Icon Skip to content
Subscribe
Log In
  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Restoration
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House
  • Podcast
Log In

Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum

Oil versus gas for heating boilers

| Posted in Energy, Heating & Insulation on March 15, 2002 02:20am

*
What are the pros and cons of oil versus gas for heating a water boiler? I am installing a WIRSBO radiant floor heating system and I have a choice of heating the boiler with oil or with gas. The WIRSBO reps here are recommending oil, but needless to say I worry about the volatile prices of oil.

All views and advice appreciated.

Muniini K. Mulera

Reply
  • X
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • pinterest
  • email
  • add to favorites Log in or Sign up to save your favorite articles

Replies

  1. Bob_Walker | Dec 04, 2001 02:52am | #1

    *
    My
    i impressions
    are that (i) oil boilers need more maintenance and (ii) oil stinks.

    1. David_Thomas | Dec 04, 2001 03:52am | #2

      *Also, oil tanks take up some real estate and don't last forever. In some states, fuel oil tanks are exempted from underground tank regulations. If not, a leaking oil tank can costing thousands to tens of thousands of dollars. It therefore can be a concern to potential buyers. Persumably you already have gas to the house. Why add oil? If you don't already have gas, adding it allows you to have a more responsive cooktop, much faster clothes drying, and faster recovery on your HWH. Most people get natural gas if they possibly can, with good reason. Most people who have oil didn't have any other choice. -David

      1. Bob_Walker | Dec 04, 2001 05:38am | #3

        *" In some states, fuel oil tanks are exempted from underground tank regulations."Other places have problems.Place I built in the 70's in MA had an underground tank. Saved me $$ each year. When I sold it in '97, the banks there wouldn't lend against a house with an underground tank.Did an inspection last week with a suspected underground tank (NW Ohio). I was told that the Buyer's Ins co won't insure a house with an undergrouind tank. I don't know if that's an anomoly or a trend.

        1. Tim_Rice | Dec 04, 2001 03:40pm | #4

          *Muniini,Natural gas, if available is preferred for the reasons well covered in previous posts. Ask the reps recommending oil why? They may know something specific to your situation that makes it a better choice.Bob,Not a trend or an anomaly. Regulations against underground liquid (except lp) storage tanks past in the last decade have made their use more costly (double wall construction, leak detection and monitoring) and owner liability for cleanup and ground water contamination has made insurance very expensive or unobtainable. I've seen many Mom and Pop gas stations go out of business because of the new regulations. Couldn't afford to upgrade, state would allow operation without.

          1. Bob_Walker | Dec 04, 2001 03:52pm | #5

            *Tim,Good points. I was thinking of residential underground oil tanks.MA is way "ahead" of many areas in discouraging them. In OH the subject has been a big yawn so far, with this report of an ins. co. getting squirrely about them being the first hint of a change in direction.Kind of like 60 amp services. A few in.s co.s got antsy about them, now FHA and VA won't underwrite mortgages against homes with 60 amp services; 100 is the minimum.For many of the houses I inspect, 60 amps is fine, at least until they redo the kitchen and have to add all of those extra circuits!

          2. David_Thomas | Dec 04, 2001 05:15pm | #6

            *An CA is even further "ahead" of MA in environmental regulations in that they had (for years now) a backlash against the costs of headaches of those regs. They (last I worked there) had exempted residential tanks. Too politically unpopular to go after homeowners in situations with no solution. You gonna demo the neighbor's house to dig up dirty soil?Tim: you're right, except in most states, it was federal UST regs (implemented by the states) that drove the Mom & Pop's under*. The feds kept rolling back the final, drop-dead date because so many stations hadn't complied. But December 23, 1999 was the final deadline. Upgraded tanks or no one will deliver fuel to you.(*) Plus a general trend towards multi-pump, no-service stations with mini-marts. Because cars are so much more reliable now and Slurpies and Cheetios have a much higher margin than gasoline.

          3. Gary_Beebe | Dec 04, 2001 09:41pm | #7

            *What is the cost per btu for oil vs gas? Oil probably has it beat. I don't have natural gas but could get propane but am leaning toward using oil based on that oil and propane are within .10 cents of each other in my area and oil has about 50 percent more btu/gallon

          4. David_Thomas | Dec 04, 2001 09:57pm | #8

            *Oil often beats propane. Rarely does oil beat natural gas. For me natural gas is $0.38 / 100,000 BTUs. Propane is $1.59 / 100,000. Oil about $.95/100,000. My electricity is $2.40/100,000 BTU. Your mileage may differ. Objects in mirror are closer than they appear. Check your own prices locally. -David

          5. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Dec 06, 2001 01:46am | #9

            *David...Lets do my numbers....Oil is $1/g...Propane is $1/g...electric is .14/KW...Wood...takes a hundred pounds to hear a home/day midwinter @ 40,000btu/hour maybe...I just hear about the poundage actually.Give me a hand with this...near the stream,ajI thinks my 2000sqft home needs 40,000btus when real cold and 20,000btus average for 3 months midwinter...just guessing...Uses about $900 of electric to heat per year.

          6. David_Thomas | Dec 06, 2001 02:36am | #10

            *Jack,Your heat loss numbers (40,000 BTU/hour at 0 or 10F) look right on if the house is typical modern construction (the entire envelope was insulated within the last 20 years but is not super-insulated nor super-tight).Wood has around 8,000 BTU/pound, but that is a function of moisture content. (Pound/cubic foot is a function of species). So 100 pounds is 800,000 BTU/day or 33,000 BTU/hour (gross). If the stove is 70% efficient, then house is requiring 23,000 BTU/hour(net) when you use 100 pound/day.Propane has a heat content of 89,000 BTU/gallon. At 80% efficiency, $1/ gallon propane appliance costs $1.40 / 100,000 BTU's delivered.Oil has a heat content of 136,000 BTU/gallon. At 80% efficiency, $1/ gallon oil appliance costs $0.92 / 100,000 BTU's delivered.Electric has a heat content of 3,415 BTU/kwh. At 100% efficiency, $0.14/kwh electricity costs $4.10 / 100,000 BTU's delivered.So compared to oil usage, that 100 pounds of wood you haul (and drop, buck, split, and stack) saves $5.00 per day. (552,000 BTU/day released inside your house times $0.92 / 100,000 BTU's delivered.)You'll feel better about schelping that wood around if you compare it to electric usage. Then your efforts save you $22.60/day or $700/month. From which I conclude that you don't use your electric heat very much if your yearly bill is only $900. -David

          7. Tim_Rice | Dec 06, 2001 03:29pm | #11

            *Dave,14c/kwh is pretty high, as is 1.59/therm of lp. I don't have any experience with heating oil, but if it were available, it wouldn't work in my dryer or my Viking (range). 8c/kwh in N IL was pretty rough on the budget. Used to heat with all electric because that how the house I own was built (in 1971 when nukes were going to make electricity "too cheap to meter") Changed to lp because NG is not available in my rural area yet. I locked in a contract for $0.65/gal in 1999 and $0.85/gal in 2000 and $1.00/gal this year. I guess living in the arctic circle has its costs, eh?Muniini lives in south central Canada, as I recall. Don't know the relative costs there. Based on ignorance and prejudice, I'd have to recommend the gas option.

          8. Andy_Engel_ | Dec 06, 2001 04:43pm | #12

            *I had propane heat in my last house, hated paying for it. I've got oil heat and DHW in this house, like them very much. Fast recovery on the DHW, and I'm paying about half in heat. (Part of that is that this house is better insulated) I also have propane for the stove and dryer, but that costs only about $50/year. Oil tank in the basement, propane tank buried in the yard.Andy

          9. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Dec 06, 2001 05:10pm | #13

            *Super post David...thanks....I believe 20btu/hour to be the number I need to work with. Both my house and my brothers are new in the last twenty years. He just had installed an airtight fireplace to heat his house. Puts out 60,000btu max and will burn through the night hopes. It puts out huge heat compared to my zero clearance fireplace ( I didn't build the house!)So my numbers for dead of winter...3 months=90daysx24hr/dyx20,000btu/hr=43,200,000btus for winter heat./100,000=432wood 43200 pounds...10 plus cords x $85/cord= $850/winteroil 432 units.....= $400/winterLP 432x1.42......= $613/winterLP High efficeincy...92%...432x1.22 ...= $527/winterElectric very expnsive here...432x4.10...= $1771/winterAs you said David...I am using less btus somehow because my total year electric bill for all uses is only $1800. So my average BTU needs are closer to 10,000btu/hour taking the following into consideration...So....I burn wood nightly (50lbs/somenights@2cords/winter)...heat system shuts off for 6 hours...Daytime sun..lots of South glass...shuts off on sunny days...and finally the heat pump works well when above 40 degrees which happens for maybe 15% of the winter.Changes coming....tighten envelope...more insulation...higher efficiency wood unit...mine is probably at 20% max...Lp heated floor loops for kitchen and 2 baths down...LP woodstove type unit hooked up finally for non fire hours and cold weather....LP instead of electric for water heat...LP for stove eventually...LP for dryer already.Results expected...warmer home...warmer floors...warm bathrooms in the AM! Savings...enough to pay for changes...and higher temp. settings.Near the stream,aj

          10. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Dec 06, 2001 05:17pm | #14

            *DHW....Dark Haired Wife...?Dying horses waiting..Dry Hot Water...Help me Andy...near the stream,aj60 degrees again today...Off to pick another 10 gallons of CWF to apply to my freshly powerwashed cedar sided home...which by the way is looking pretty good these days if I do say so myself!

          11. David_Thomas | Dec 06, 2001 09:13pm | #15

            *Tim: Yes, $0.14/kwh is high but that is what AJ says he pays. Some areas of NY are as much as $0.25/kwh. Knew someone outside of Portland, Oregon that had his rate doubled (to $0.02/kwh) a few years ago. New Zealand has the bargain electrons. $0.005NZ/kwh. I pay $0.083/kwh but only $0.38/therm of natural gas (an advantage to living on top of an oil/gas field).DHW = domestic hot waterAJ: You missed a factor in the your wood costs. 43,200,000 BTU / 8,000 BTU/pound of wood = 5,400 pounds of wood. If your stove is 50% efficient, then 10,800 pounds of wood or 2 to 3 cords. $200 bucks. Wood is almost always cheaper. And always more work. I doubt your wood stove is as bad as 20% - that's like a California fireplace. If it's got doors you can closed down and a damper it's got to be 30-40% or better. Any fan? Metal flue or brick chimney? Too bad you can't get my natural gas. Then the total bill would be $205/year w/o any wood usage. -David

          12. Muniini_Mulera | Dec 06, 2001 09:47pm | #16

            *Hello everyone:This is a very helpful discussion. I am leaning heavily towards choosing Natural Gas heating (rather than oil) for the boiler. Seems to me there really is not a major benefit of oil compared to gas. Yet practical issues like the smell of oil, having to remember to refill the tank etc. are as important as the cost. Cost wise here in Toronto, Canada, - not much difference at the moment. Thank you all again.Muniini

          13. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Dec 07, 2001 06:21am | #17

            *David....Looking at an oil fired water heater...such as... http://www.bockwaterheaters.com/index1024.htmlnear the stream,aj

          14. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Dec 07, 2001 10:21pm | #18

            *Update....Actual electric used in dead of winter....shows need for 5 million BTUs/mth and that is with temp set low in home at night..63Degrees.That works out to 7,000btus/hr for the coldest 5 months.Plan....Lower cost of btu purchase...raise temp inside to 68 degrees and use some radiant floor and radiant LP stove. Oil for DHW combined with radiant floor loops.4 million btus from 80% efficient oil...Cost...136x.8=109,000btus/buck...40gals/month this year's price $1/g...$40-60/mth... $480-720/yr.gasstove...20,000btus/3hrs/dayx30=2 million btusgasdryer$stove...60g/yr 5/mth..$5-6/mth...$60-72/year2 mill/89,000=22gals/mth...5 mths...112gals/year...$120-$160in higher cost years.Basic lighting/refrig electric down to 300KW/mth...$45/mth...$540/year.Total costs$540-600 lights$120-160 gas-stove$060-072 gas-other$480-720 oil-RadiantHeat/DHW$1200-1552 for the year... $1800-2000+/yr now at lower temp... So... the plan... Saving $60/mth...$700/year and upping temp. 5 degrees.Cost to install changes...Contractor out $8000...My cost...$2500ish.Payback...if money earns 5%= 9 years roughly...then figure in cost of maintenance and make yourself really sick.Maybe better to go back to not knowing the numbers...near the stream chopping wood again,ajWell the best news would be the winter shocking electric bills would be Gone! From several hundred...to $45 for electric...and start buying fuel summers when the money is a plenty and the cost of fuel is the lowest. August fillups could last through the winter. Yeah!!...Winter $$$ then goes to Carribean beach time again!

          15. Stray_ | Dec 07, 2001 11:57pm | #19

            *"Winter $$$ then goes to Carribean beach time again!"AJ...sounds good!new numbers to consider then:forget wood, forget oil, forget electric.Sell house for $XRent bungalow on Carribean beach for $Xpermanently near the blue waters...forgetting the cold stream.Then again, they don't ski down there ;-)

          16. SCOTT_HABERER | Dec 15, 2001 03:36am | #20

            *Years ago, I used to work boilers at a local packing house. Once every few years, the local utility company would give notice of a rate increase. The big packer (with 6 each 120psi 900-hp boilers) would threaten to switch to fuel oil if the utility would raise their rates. They would run for about 2 to three weeks on fuel oil and the boilers were forever shutting down. The fire eye would get sooty and then it would shut down the burners. It was really a hassle, but after the utility lost about 3 weeks of natural gas revenues, they would relent and freeze this one customer's rates and we would switch back to natural gas. It was really a hassle but then, these monsters were huge and probably not as reliable as your smaller unit. Perhaps you may want to consider a set up that uses both natural gas or fuel-oil (for those emergencies or whatever) and use what ever is most convenient. I would also recommend that you locate your fuel tank above ground and then you won't have as much hassle with the EPA and getting rid of it will be so much more easier. Then again, with natural gas only, you won't have to get rid of a tank eventually. Ever consider a wood-burner or corn-burner? Scotty/Sioux city.

          17. David_Daniels | Jan 02, 2002 07:23am | #21

            *I would go with gas boiler will stay cleaner less mantance . who knows what the price of anything will be . Oil needs service every year so it burns clean , oil has more parts to break .

          18. Randy_Rogers | Jan 31, 2002 09:04pm | #22

            *I've lived with both oil and natural gas. For me, all the talk of btu's is for naught as the cost of maintaining an oil burner, being at the mercy of local oil distributer, putting up with smell, dead shrubs around oil fill pipe, and finding a capable technician to service today's complicated oil burners, do not outweigh the convenience and cleanliness and low maintenance of natural gas.

          19. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Jan 31, 2002 09:48pm | #23

            *Randy...Natural gas is most peoples first choice. But where I am, there is only overpriced LP, and electric. Well maintained modern oil systems minimise smell, but I agree, don't eliminate it.near the stream,aj

          20. NEIOWA_ | Mar 09, 2002 06:56pm | #24

            *I heat with Gas. Don't know that I necessarily would install in a new building. In fact planning a ground source heatpump as we renovate.NG is convient and clean. Efficient relative to electric for waterheat/dryer. Gas flame (or wood) is great for a wok compared to an electric element on a stove. That is all I see to recommend gas.Oil or LP does have significant advantages that have not been mentioned.1. You have an on site storage vessel. You are in control of the input cost of your daily heat usage. Fill your tank/tanks off season and you will have HUGE savings vs spot price which is what you pay to the NG provider. If spot prices go crazy, as they did in winter of 00-01 you can, laugh all the way to the bank. Here in the midwest Jan price was 3to4x "normal" Jan for all sources. And even in "normal" Jan price is much higher July. If you use NG you are subject to the business practices/incompetence of your gas provider. Alliant, who provides my gas, apparently is not familiar with forward contracting for their (my) gas needs and due to severe winter of 00-01 purchased huge amounts of NG on the spot market. Who pays the bill? You/me. If you use Oil or LP national/regional "shortage" is irrelevant to you. Even in a normal year filling your tank in July/Aug for usage in Jan/Feb will "earn" you a better return that any security in which you might invest your $. Anyone else time fill their car gas tank at the station that is $0.03-0.04 less or do you just fill up at the first station you come to regardless of the price?2. Any idiot that can pull romex can install required oil lines for an oil burning furnace.3. Installing a oil burner does not voluntarily bring into your home huge quanitities of an explosive inflammable toxic vapor (natural gas).4. You can burn the same fuel you use in your heat source in your diesel mode of transport at 1/2 the government approved fuel price. This is illegal of course; as is farmers using "farm" fuel in their personal transport vehicle, never happens.5. Remember to fill tanks??? You that simple get a bigger tank which is what you should have anyhow. Min tank size should be large enough to eliminate refill from Dec1-Mar1. Follow plan in pt #1 and you have storage for entire heating season on hand. Have a backup electic source to run your equipment you are imune to the whims of weather and the corportate energy market/industry.6. When you smell fuel oil (yes stinks) you're in good shape (you still got heat). NG smells worse and when you smell it you got BIG problems.

          21. Tim_Rice | Mar 11, 2002 03:04pm | #25

            *NEIOWA,"NG is convient and clean. Efficient relative to electric for waterheat/dryer."Commom misconception. You will not find an energy source more efficient than electricity. All heat production devices the rely on fire have losses associated with products of combustion and heat transfer. Electricity, seldom, if ever has any losses, at the consumer level. All losses were taken at the power plant. However, in most parts of the country, it is the most expensive energy source to use for heat.

          22. Jim_Pappas | Mar 12, 2002 03:44pm | #26

            *"All losses were taken at the power plant."There are also losses during the transmission of the power from the plant to your house.

          23. Tim_Rice | Mar 13, 2002 02:36pm | #27

            *True, but I don't know what those losses are, do you? I think the line losses are relatively insignificant. I know that a very efficient power plant will operate in the range of 60-70% thermal efficiency. Most are not that efficient.

          24. Royboy_ | Mar 13, 2002 04:52pm | #28

            *another consideration on the electric front is that off-peak rates are usually available and depending the type of heating system and how the ultility handles peaks - off-peak can work well for space heating needs.I tired of installing thermostatically controlled radiant floor systems for customers and coming home to my wood boiler heated radiant slab that had cooled during the workday and didn't get back up to temp til bedtime. Was about to put in a propane water heater as a heat source when I ran the numbers on off-peak electric vs propane. My utility offers off-peak for $.048/kwh which is cheaper than propane when I priced it. As a proponent in general of decentralized power generation I'm not exactly walking the talk, but for now it's awful nice to come home to a house up to temp when it's -30 out.

          25. Bill_Hartmann | Mar 13, 2002 05:02pm | #29

            *RoyIn my area non-summer (8 months) electric rates are 0.0334/kwh. Than number is 24*7. While effiencies have meaning when comparing systems using the same fuel, it really gets down to heat output per $1 of fuel when you are comparing different fuels and different types of systems.

          26. The_Tennis_Court_Builder_...on_t | Mar 13, 2002 05:46pm | #30

            *Cheap electric rates are rare for the most part. Way too expensive here. Just the delivery fee here is as high as the low costs being discussed.near the expensive electric stream,aj

          27. Tim_Rice | Mar 14, 2002 02:53pm | #31

            *Bill,$0.0334/kwh is very, very cheap. If electricity cost that here in the the land of Uncommonly Weathly Edison (Commonwealth Edison) I would never consider any other source. Since you get 100% of what you pay for with electric heat, so much the better. The national average residential electric rate is about $0.08/kwh.I did a simple energy study and for my circumstances and electricity would have to cost $0.039/kwh or less to compete with $1.00/gallon LP, @94% efficiency. Here, now, NG is available at $0.45 - $0.48/therm for NG, but not available out in the sticks.Royboy, things may be different in your neck of the woods, but in most areas, peak electric rates apply to the cooling season only (June through September with ComEd). The rest of the year, there is more than enough to go around and they're happy to sell it.Warm, but with a big tank in my yard,Tim

          28. Royboy_ | Mar 14, 2002 04:00pm | #32

            *Tim - here, in northern WI, the electric utilities have their peak loads during the heating season. I subscribe to an off-peak heating program where I get a second meter through which I run my heating load & my water heater (I've also got a freezer tied into it though that's not what the utility has in mind). That line is radio interruptable by the utility, but in actuality it is only turned off for relatively short periods on rare occasions. All power through that meter costs half the rate of regular power! (currently $.048 rather than $.096/kwh) A good deal and worth checking with your utility to see if they offer something like this. My utility is a rural electric coop and there is another utility locally (a mega-corporate one) that has an off-peak program also but the terms aren't nearly as favorable. I'm fortunate in that regard.

          29. Tim_Rice | Mar 15, 2002 02:20pm | #33

            *Rb,Actually I had a reduced rate because of electric heat and electric water heat, but ComEd is phasing those out and the cost with the break was still more than than the most expensive LP I've ever had to buy.I once worked for Commonwealth Edison and would watch the system demand climb in the afternoon on hot summer days. The rates they charge have turned most everyone off from electric heating. There is "interruptable" rates available to residential consumers, but again the break is, in my opinion, insignificant and its only for summer. I guess that's the cost of having 10 nuclear units in operation, 4 in decommissioning and decades of mismanagement.

Log in or create an account to post a comment.

Sign up Log in

Become a member and get full access to FineHomebuilding.com

Video Shorts

Categories

  • Business
  • Code Questions
  • Construction Techniques
  • Energy, Heating & Insulation
  • General Discussion
  • Help/Work Wanted
  • Photo Gallery
  • Reader Classified
  • Tools for Home Building

Discussion Forum

Recent Posts and Replies

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |
View More Create Post

Up Next

Video Shorts

Featured Story

FHB Podcast Segment: Finding Hazardous Materials in a Fixer-Upper

Look closely at these common locations for hazardous materials in older homes.

Featured Video

Builder’s Advocate: An Interview With Viewrail

Learn more about affordable, modern floating stairs, from design to manufacturing to installation.

Related Stories

  • Podcast Episode 693: Old-House Hazards, Building Larsen Trusses, AI in Construction
  • FHB Podcast Segment: Finding Hazardous Materials in a Fixer-Upper
  • A Classic Paint Sprayer Gets a Thoughtful Refresh
  • Podcast Episode 692: Introduction to Trade Work, Embodied Carbon, and Envelope Improvements

Highlights

Fine Homebuilding All Access
Fine Homebuilding Podcast
Tool Tech
Plus, get an extra 20% off with code GIFT20

"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Fine Homebuilding Magazine

  • Issue 332 - July 2025
    • Custom Built-ins With Job-Site Tools
    • Fight House Fires Through Design
    • Making the Move to Multifamily
  • Issue 331 - June 2025
    • A More Resilient Roof
    • Tool Test: You Need a Drywall Sander
    • Ducted vs. Ductless Heat Pumps
  • Issue 330 - April/May 2025
    • Deck Details for Durability
    • FAQs on HPWHs
    • 10 Tips for a Long-Lasting Paint Job
  • Issue 329 - Feb/Mar 2025
    • Smart Foundation for a Small Addition
    • A Kominka Comes West
    • Making Small Kitchens Work
  • Issue 328 - Dec/Jan 2025
    • How a Pro Replaces Columns
    • Passive House 3.0
    • Tool Test: Compact Line Lasers

Fine Home Building

Newsletter Sign-up

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox.

  • Green Building Advisor

    Building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.

  • Old House Journal

    Repair, renovation, and restoration tips, plus special offers, in your inbox.

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters

Follow

  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
  • Fine Homebuilding

    Dig into cutting-edge approaches and decades of proven solutions with total access to our experts and tradespeople.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X
    • LinkedIn
  • GBA Prime

    Get instant access to the latest developments in green building, research, and reports from the field.

    Start Free Trial Now
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
  • Old House Journal

    Learn how to restore, repair, update, and decorate your home.

    Subscribe Now
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • X

Membership & Magazine

  • Online Archive
  • Start Free Trial
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Magazine Renewal
  • Gift a Subscription
  • Customer Support
  • Privacy Preferences
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Terms of Use
  • Site Map
  • Do not sell or share my information
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • California Privacy Rights

© 2025 Active Interest Media. All rights reserved.

Fine Homebuilding receives a commission for items purchased through links on this site, including Amazon Associates and other affiliate advertising programs.

  • Home Group
  • Antique Trader
  • Arts & Crafts Homes
  • Bank Note Reporter
  • Cabin Life
  • Cuisine at Home
  • Fine Gardening
  • Fine Woodworking
  • Green Building Advisor
  • Garden Gate
  • Horticulture
  • Keep Craft Alive
  • Log Home Living
  • Military Trader/Vehicles
  • Numismatic News
  • Numismaster
  • Old Cars Weekly
  • Old House Journal
  • Period Homes
  • Popular Woodworking
  • Script
  • ShopNotes
  • Sports Collectors Digest
  • Threads
  • Timber Home Living
  • Traditional Building
  • Woodsmith
  • World Coin News
  • Writer's Digest
Active Interest Media logo
X
X
This is a dialog window which overlays the main content of the page. The modal window is a 'site map' of the most critical areas of the site. Pressing the Escape (ESC) button will close the modal and bring you back to where you were on the page.

Main Menu

  • How-To
  • Design
  • Tools & Materials
  • Video
  • Blogs
  • Forum
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Magazine
  • Members
  • FHB House

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Podcasts

  • FHB Podcast
  • ProTalk

Webinars

  • Upcoming and On-Demand

Popular Topics

  • Kitchens
  • Business
  • Bedrooms
  • Roofs
  • Architecture and Design
  • Green Building
  • Decks
  • Framing
  • Safety
  • Remodeling
  • Bathrooms
  • Windows
  • Tilework
  • Ceilings
  • HVAC

Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Magazine Index
  • Subscribe
  • Online Archive
  • Author Guidelines

All Access

  • Member Home
  • Start Free Trial
  • Gift Membership

Online Learning

  • Courses
  • Project Guides
  • Reader Projects
  • Podcast

More

  • FHB Ambassadors
  • FHB House
  • Customer Support

Account

  • Log In
  • Join

Newsletter

Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox

Signing you up...

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
See all newsletters
See all newsletters

Follow

  • X
  • YouTube
  • instagram
  • facebook
  • pinterest
  • Tiktok

Join All Access

Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.

Start Your Free Trial

Subscribe

FHB Magazine

Start your subscription today and save up to 70%

Subscribe

Enjoy unlimited access to Fine Homebuilding. Join Now

Already a member? Log in

We hope you’ve enjoyed your free articles. To keep reading, become a member today.

Get complete site access to expert advice, how-to videos, Code Check, and more, plus the print magazine.

Start your FREE trial

Already a member? Log in

Privacy Policy Update

We use cookies, pixels, script and other tracking technologies to analyze and improve our service, to improve and personalize content, and for advertising to you. We also share information about your use of our site with third-party social media, advertising and analytics partners. You can view our Privacy Policy here and our Terms of Use here.

Cookies

Analytics

These cookies help us track site metrics to improve our sites and provide a better user experience.

Advertising/Social Media

These cookies are used to serve advertisements aligned with your interests.

Essential

These cookies are required to provide basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website.

Delete My Data

Delete all cookies and associated data