I’ll be installing a shake roof soon, and my material options are cedar or treated (still don’t know treated what yet). My questions are difference in life expectancy and appearance. The customer wants the same look, and I’m leaning towards the treated, but would like some advice.
Discussion Forum
Discussion Forum
Up Next
Video Shorts
Featured Story

Performance improvements for the prized homes of an influential developer who wanted us all to be able to own one.
Featured Video
Builder’s Advocate: An Interview With ViewrailHighlights
"I have learned so much thanks to the searchable articles on the FHB website. I can confidently say that I expect to be a life-long subscriber." - M.K.
Fine Homebuilding Magazine
- Home Group
- Antique Trader
- Arts & Crafts Homes
- Bank Note Reporter
- Cabin Life
- Cuisine at Home
- Fine Gardening
- Fine Woodworking
- Green Building Advisor
- Garden Gate
- Horticulture
- Keep Craft Alive
- Log Home Living
- Military Trader/Vehicles
- Numismatic News
- Numismaster
- Old Cars Weekly
- Old House Journal
- Period Homes
- Popular Woodworking
- Script
- ShopNotes
- Sports Collectors Digest
- Threads
- Timber Home Living
- Traditional Building
- Woodsmith
- World Coin News
- Writer's Digest
Replies
Greetings too,
This post, in response to your question, will bump the thread through the 'recent discussion' listing again which will increase it's viewing.
Perhaps it will catch someone's attention that can help you with advice.
Cheers
Click here for access to the Woodshed Tavern
Click here to visit the beginning of Breaktime
There is fire treated to resit flammability and there is PT chemical treatment to resist rot.
In my experience, the latter is used for shakes only to try to sell species that are inappropriate for roofing. Even though they sometimes are effective at preventing rotting shakes, these woods are still far more likely to split, cup, twist and need replacement within ten years anyways. Stick with the Cedar.
Welcome to the
Taunton University of Knowledge FHB Campus at Breaktime.
where ...
Excellence is its own reward!
Piffin's got it nailed on the type of wood: cedar is the way to go. But two important considerations that have a bearing on the longevity of any wood roofing are sun exposure and pitch. Both of these affect the longevity of wood shakes or shingles because they affect how well the roof dries between wettings.
Shallow pitch roofs don't drain as rapidly, or as well, as steeper ones. There is also the question of ice damming, if you are in the snow belt. Below 6 in 12, I don't think shakes are a good idea although you may find some people who are willing to put them on a roof as shallow as 4 in 12.
Secondly, the roof of a house which is heavily shaded by trees, landscape (hills, etc.) or other buildings will dry very slowly. Areas which receive little or no direct sunlight can take days or weeks to dry completely after a bad downpour, and that will shorten the life of wood shakes quite noticeably. Roofs which collect dead leaves or pine needles stay wet longer, too.
Dinosaur
How now, Mighty Sauron, that thou art not brought
low by this? For thine evil pales before that which
foolish men call Justice....
Use fire retardant treated cedar tapersplits - the fire retardant chemicals impart a certain amount of rot resistance too.
Jeff
Edited 5/1/2008 10:17 pm ET by Jeff_Clarke