I’m building my son a treehouse, the walls forming an isosceles triangle. I want to frame the roof with a 12/12 pitch to match the house, but I’m not sure how to cut the rafters properly without wasting a unit of lumber. I visualize the roof coming to a point at the center of the triangle.
Any suggestions?
Replies
Joe Fusco He's our man if he can't do it no one can !!!
Rah Rah.
http://www.joefusce.com is the link I believe.
Good Luck!
Mr T
Do not try this at home!
I am a trained professional!
I would run a hunk of 4 x 4 through the saw so that it is three sided and square cut the tops of the the rafters on a 12/12 pitch then the rest is just simple filling in of jack rafters.
Have fun with that last cap shingle.
Todd - Framing Square
Redstaines,
Using the toothpick and raisin method, I determine your hip pitch to be 20.78/12. That is by far the most accurate way to determine these things.
You could start with 12/12 commons perpendicular from the center of the sides and just measure the hips too.
Fusco may correct me.
Tom
At the grave risk of stepping into something, what, pray tell, is the 'toothpick & raisin' method? i've looked in my Construction Principles, Materials and Methods as well as all the cookbooks we have, and can't seem to find it.
I was thinking of using the native american technique of teepee style framing, i.e. binding the rafters together at the center with a bit of buffalo hide, but I need a plausible explanation to satisfy my kid and his friends that his daddy really is a professional builder.
thanks for all the suggestions!
Tommy,
View Image
Edited 6/20/2002 12:22:15 PM ET by J Fusco
Edited 6/20/2002 12:23:22 PM ET by J Fusco
Now I remember why I always hired roofcutters to do my roof framing if it was anything other than a simple gable or dutch-gable roof. My first thought was to do more or less what Dunc said, i.e., find the center point of the roof at the top plane of the walls by bisecting each side, measure the run from each corner of the triangle to that point, then use that number to calculate the length of each hip. Is that more or less what we're talking about?
Thanks for all the input - these forums are a great resource that I've never really used before. Its great to know there's such an active and friendly builder's community out there!
>> ... by bisecting each side ...
Not the sides. Bisect the angles. Bisecting the angles gives you the center of the inscribed circle, a circle that touches each side of the triangle. That means the shortest line from the center point to each wall is a radius of the circle and is perpendicular to the wall, so that all three rafters are the same length and the three roof planes have the same pitch.
Bisecting the sides gives you the center of the circumscribed circle, one that touches each corner of the triangle. If you use that for the peak of the roof, you won't have equal pitch on all three planes. If your tree house were a 45/45/90 triangle, for instance, the roof plane rising from the long side would be vertical.
Uncle,
View Image
I just got out a piece of graph paper to draw this out for myself (I'm much more visual that theoretical) and drew a perpendicular line from the centerpoint of each side of an isosceles triangle, and they met at a point equidistant from each corner. Isn't that what I want to do - have all the hips the same length?
What am I missing?
Maybe it was all those spitballs I was shooting instead of listening to my geometry teacher.
Red,
View Image
Oops, I meant to say the base is 10'4", the sides are 9'9".
Pretty close to equilateral, but far enough off to confuse me.
>> How about some numbers.
OK. Consider a triangle with one side 4' long and 2 sides each 10' long. Perpendiculars from the midpoint of each side intersect at a point 4.70' from the midpoint of the short side and 1.02' from the midpoints of the long side. The distance from the point of intersection to the corners is 5.10'. If a pitch of the two long sides is 12/12, the peak of the roof is 1.02 feet above the plane of the triangle. The length of the 3 equal hips is 5.20' The pitch of the third plane is 1.02/4.70, or 2.6/12.
If the pitch of the short side is 12/12, the peak of the roof is 4.70' above the plane of the triangle, the length of the hips is 6.94', and the pitch of the two long sides is 4.70/1.02, or 55.3/12.
So if the center of the circumscribed circle is used, the hips are the same length, but the pitches are not equal.
Lines bisecting the angles intersect at a point 1.63' from the midpoint of the short side. Lines from that point perpendicular to the long sides intersect the sides 2' from the corners, and are also 1.63' long. If 12/12 pitch is selected, the peak of the roof is 1.63' above the plane of the triangle. The distance from the point of intersection to the two ends of the short side, and therefore the run of the two short hips, is 2.58'. The length of the short hips is 3.05' The distance from the point of intersection to the other corner is 8.17', and the length of the hip is 8.33'.
If the center of the inscribed circle is used, the pitches are equal, but the hip lengths are different.
Using your numbers, you have three choices,
1. Equal hips of 6'3.3", 12/12 pitch on the long side, 9.9/12 on the short sides.
2. Equal hips of 6'6.1", 12/12 pitch on the short sides, 14.5/12 on the long side.
3. Two hips at 6'6.8", one at 6'1.4". 12/12 pitch on all three planes.
Let me know if you want to see the calculations.
Thanks Uncle. I'm plan to use your calcs, augmented with some cool drawings by JFusco to build my roof. I'll post a copy of the results
Uncle,
View Image
Edited 6/21/2002 8:25:21 AM ET by J Fusco
>> I have no reason to be abusive to you.
I'm glad to hear it. So why do you keep saying my posts are hard to decipher but never specifying what needs to be clarified? That feels abusive to me. I like to think I could meet your standard for clarity if you'd just tell me where I fall short.
>> OK try these numbers. . .
>> 1 long side 10' 2-1/2"
>> 2 short side 7' 2-5/8".
This is the 45/45/90 case I mentioned earlier. Using the center of the circumscribed circle, the run of the 3 equal hips is 61.25", the peak of the roof is directly over the midpoint of the long side, so the plane of the roof rising from the long side is vertical, more like a gable end than a section of roof.
Using the center of the inscribed circle, you can still make a normal looking roof. You'd have one short hip, a little under 30" run, and two long hips, somewhere around 70" run and the pitch of all three roof planes is equal, whatever pitch you choose.
Edited 6/20/2002 11:28:04 PM ET by Uncle Dunc
Uncle,
I have no control over the way you "feel" about anything.
As for my example, would you call it a triangular gable? Does it really have 3 hips or does it have 1 hip and two commons that are the same length?
My first post was what I thought would be the simplest approach to framing a triangular roof a triangle with equal sides.
As far as clarity, you might want to tell how you "get" the answers as opposed to just stating them.
Hey look, a discussion about framing hips! Just like the robin is a sure sign of spring, this leads me to believe that this forum is returning back to normal.
Ahhh, the good old days....
:)Close enough for government work
I got the answer right didn't I?
The toothpick and raisin method...
I did the math and then assembled a model using toothpicks and raisins at the joints. Then I eyeballed the hip, yep my eye tells me its 20.78/twelve, just like my figgerin. Estimated time 43 seconds.
Yes redstains stated it was an isoceles triangle, which I assumed was an equilateral right triangle. If it was something else, we would need alot more information. And I would have to cut the toothpics. Raisins on the other hand would still remain whole. In a pinch you can use dried currants, but the shear strength is not as great.Tom
Tommy,
View Image
You only want all three hips the same length if all three walls are the same length. If all three sides of the triangle are the same length, both methods do in fact yield the same center. If the walls are different lengths, you can build a roof with the same pitch on all three planes, or a roof with the hip rafters the same length, but not both. For triangles where one angle is greater than 90 degrees, the center of the circumscribed circle isn't even in the triangle.
When I was in school, an isosceles triangle was one that had two sides the same length and we called a triangle that had all three sides the same length an equilateral triangle. It's true that an equilateral triangle is a special case of isosceles triangle, but since there is a specific name for equilateral triangles, I assumed that your isosceles triangle was the more general case, with two sides the same length and the third side either longer or shorter.
If you're talking about a 60/60/60 triangle, then of course you're right, along with Joe and everyone else who made that assumption, and I was insisting on a lot of unnecessary work.
Red,
View Image
He didn't say it's an equilateral triangle, he said it's an isosceles triangle, which is one with two sides the same length.
Edited 6/20/2002 2:43:25 PM ET by Uncle Dunc
Uncle,
View Image
>> I can't even decipher what you said.
That happens sometimes. If you're not just saying this to be abusive, tell me the first thing you didn't understand and I'll try to clarify it.
This is coming from a machinging background where compund angles aren't so very uncommon, I have a hard time seeing where anyone can speculate on framing grids without knowing the lengths of the sides of the triangles, and having a go at it from there. You have specified a roof pitch which will help, but it would be easier if you gave a target height for the peak of the roof. From what I can see you want a pyramid shaped roof, with its peak in dead centre. There is a name for that shape which escapes me right now (sorry). All I can say with the info you've give so far, is that I hope you have access to a really good double compound mitre saw, and a head for numbers.
JAG
View Image
And When I must Leave the Great River, Oh Bury Me Close to its wave,And Let My Canoe and My Paddle, Be the only Mark over my Grave
Zone 5b Brantford Ontario, Canada
Bisect each angle. You have to measure or calculate half the angle. Drawing a line from the corner to the midpoint of the opposite wall will work for the unequal angle, but not for the two equal angles. The point where the angle bisectors meet is exactly under the peak of the roof. A line from the meeting point to each wall, perpendicular to the wall, represents the run of the single common rafter on each wall. (You don't have to frame it that way, of course, but it made thinking about the question easier.) The length of the rafter is 1.414 times the distance from the meeting point to the wall. The length of the hip rafters can then be found with the Pythagorean theorem.
Edited 6/20/2002 3:47:24 AM ET by Uncle Dunc
You will also need to figure your birdsmouth, which consists of a plumb and level cut.
These will determine you height at the out side of your plate.
You Williamson need to pick an over hang distance. are you having a level or sloped soffit?
You need to make sure you drop your hips (3) or you have to find the hip bevel.
if you will have a cathedral ceiling you need to determine the hip depth so you sheet rock lies in the correct plane.
Your common and hip rafters will all need a double beveled plumb cut at the top.
you will need to know the plumb cut angle for the hips.
your hip jacks will all have a single bevel top plumb cut.some 1/2 right 1/2 left.
(tip) when cutting hip or valley jacks get lumber that is long enough to give you the longest and the shortest from one board. when you make your top cut (single bevel plumb), the offcut will have the the correct cut for the opposite side of the hip/valley.
for your sheathing you will need to know the angle at the hip(and the bevel if you are anal or if you won't be roofing over it)
You will need to determine the length of you ridge board (0'-0" in your case, this is the one thing I could figure of the top of my head!)
Help me out guys, am I forgetting any thing????
Mr T
maybe a pole and a buffalo hide would be easier!!!!???!!!
remember to have fun! :)Do not try this at home!
I am a trained professional!
I love math. This problem intrigued me so much that I followed the thread all day. I even made a couple little CAD models to verify everyone's calculations. When Uncle Dunc pointed out that we were talking "isoscoles" not "equilateral" (I misunderstood the original problem. I'm not saying anyone else did) I began to wonder which was better - equal length hips or equal pitches. Then I realized.....
#1 This is a treehouse
#2 The triangle is close enough to equilateral that no one but Red will EVER know the difference, especially 20' up in a tree.
#3 Unless the house is also triangular, the treehouse roof isn't going to be an exact match no matter what method you choose.
#4 Given #1, #2 and #3, it makes sense to do the roof whatever way you feel is easiest. IMHO, use Dunc's number for equal length hips (round to the nearest 1/8") and let the slope fall where it may.
#5 I'm sure this is hasn't enlightened anyone, but it does lead to my question.... which is: Why did you made the treehouse triangular in the first place? I'm sure the reason was something like "circumstances dictated that this was the easiest/fastest/only way." I just can't imagine what those circumstances could be.
Care to satisfy my curiousity, Red?
PS Good luck with the roof. Hope the kids appreciate the thought and calculations that went into it. (Yeah, right!)
I think you're right on all five points. One reason I want to cut the rafters just right is that I may find myself relegated to sleeping in said treehouse, staring up at the roof, wondering what I did wrong, and I'd like at least to be able to admire my handiwork.
My son, who badgered me into building it in the first place, could care less whether it even has rafters - a blue tarp would be fine with him. Not a bad idea when I think about it.
As to why the triangular shape, I kind of backed into into it, since we don't really have the ideal tree layout for a treehouse (huge cherry, elm or chestnut trees are perfect - we have 100' Douglas firs where the bottom branches are 40' off the ground), I decided to strap adjustable steel girdles around two adjacent firs about 16' off the ground and added a post about 10' away. Then I build a triagular platform and laid decking over it. Had I been thinking clearly about this, I would have made the triangle equilateral, but such is not the case. But you're right, it's close enough to equilateral that nobody but me would ever notice.
Thanks to everybody for all the great input!
" One reason I want to cut the rafters just right is that I may find myself relegated to sleeping in said treehouse, staring up at the roof, wondering what I did wrong, and I'd like at least to be able to admire my handiwork."
In the Home Depot ad for the guy that does not even have a hammer, but promises his son a tree house. Look at the last second or two of the ad.
The and the kid are in the tree house and the dad rolls he eyes when the kid thanks him.
It looks to me that he is thinking "I hope that this stays up until moringing".
OK.....as much as I love a good math problem and laying out the rafters to they fit 30 ft off the ground......It's a freaking tree house....and the roof is a freaking pyramid!
Two words......STRING LINE! And another 4 words......GET ON WITH IT! So...using that great advice......make a guess...climb yer #### up there.......string it...level it....plumb it......mark it........and make it fit and get on with life!
Really...some of the most impressive roofs in the world were built with a string, a level...and some dude on the ground with a picture in his head! Have fun too...Jeff She's exotic ,but not foreign, like an old Cadillac......she's a knockout!
Makes perfect sense now that you've explained it.
I hope the roof layout goes well. Otherwise, you might be cursing under your breath "If I'd used TWO 10' support posts, this would have been so much simpler!"
Cheers,
Jon
Ff I'd have used 2 support posts, I might have ended up with a trapezium or somesuch and then I'd really be needing advice.
Red,
View Image
Joe,
Wow! After I build this roof and people ask me how I figured it so perfectly, I'll mumble something about hypotenusean cosigns and Pythagorean bisections and send them to your website for the truisms.
I think I can do it using your "simple page". Thanks bigtime!
Roger Staines (aka redstaines)
Roger,
View Image
Roger,
View Image
Edited 6/24/2002 10:31:58 PM ET by J Fusco
>> ... the "numbers" that Uncle gave are "point to point" numbers.
Yes, that's true. Sorry for not making it more explicit.
Joe,
Your great math examples make me wish I'd paid attention during those geometry and calculus classes rather than just looking at Linda Di*****on (name changed to protect the innocent).
Thanks again,
Roger